he’s forty years old. he’s babygirl. he’s unhinged. he’s creating problems for himself and everyone else. he’s god’s favorite punching bag. he’s a whore. he’s pathetic. he’s my poor little meow meow
i wake up and i am immediately thinking about those characters. i eat breakfast and i am thinking about those characters. i do chores and i am thinking about those characters. i do any work, i study, i walk the dogs, and i am thinking about those characters. i go to bed and i am thinkign
That says “5 years later, Sony still doesn’t understand why it’s biggest spider-verse hit worked”
And the article mainly talks about how the Venom films are self contained and don’t try to be films in a cinematic universe. They have a clear identity. Yes, there is no Spider-Man in them, and that’s okay because they knew what they wanted to do without him when they made the films. They even say at one point “the Venom films are not for everyone, but at least they know what they are”
This is something I personally have talked about many times. And I’ve seen other Venom fans talk about. And what I’m seeing MCU fans starting to say more and more now. The movies work when they have a clear story and identity and don’t feel interchangeable or formulaic.
You could take any Disney plus marvel show or ‘phase 4’ movie and switch the characters around and the story would probably stay largely the same, or at least feel the same. We all know what I mean right? The characters all make quips like Tony Stark no matter if it is in character or not. They talk and act the same.
But the Venom films? You couldn’t take Tom Hardy’s Eddie and swap him with the mcu cast. He acts so differently than 90% of them, he wouldn’t fit in. He’s fucking weird and unhinged and is very much Tom Hardy’s brain child.
.
Also the Venom movies worked because queer people liked them. The films were hugely popular with LGBT audiences but you didn’t hear that from me 👀👀👀👀
